Opinion
524499
12-14-2017
In the Matter of Edgar ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. William LEE, as Superintendent of Eastern N.Y. Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Edgar Ortega, Napanoch, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Edgar Ortega, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Rumsey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern N.Y. Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. "Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, including reinstatement to his prison job and back pay, inmates have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status" ( Matter of Chao v. Hollingshead, 141 A.D.3d 1072, 1072, 35 N.Y.S.3d 673 [2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Folk v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 977, 978, 994 N.Y.S.2d 550 [2014] ; Matter of Henriquez v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 962, 962, 822 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2006] ). Accordingly, and inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Chao v. Hollingshead, 141 A.D.3d at 1072, 35 N.Y.S.3d 673 ; Matter of Folk v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d at 978, 994 N.Y.S.2d 550; Matter of Henriquez v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d at 962, 822 N.Y.S.2d 923). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15, and he has requested a refund thereof, we grant such request for reimbursement of that amount.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.
McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Rumsey, JJ., concur.