From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folk v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2014
122 A.D.3d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

11-06-2014

In the Matter of Keith FOLK, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Keith Folk, Stormville, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Keith Folk, Stormville, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion (1) Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, and (2) motion for, among other things, back pay.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Although petitioner requests, both in his petition and more particularly by motion, that he be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, including reinstatement to his prior job assignment and back pay, “inmates have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status” (Matter of Hamilton v. Bezio, 93 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 940 N.Y.S.2d 496 [2012] ; see Matter of Herring v. Prack, 118 A.D.3d 1200, 1200, 987 N.Y.S.2d 269 [2014] ). Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Rafi v. Prack, 116 A.D.3d 1324, 1325, 983 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ORDERED that the motion is denied, without costs.

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Folk v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2014
122 A.D.3d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Folk v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Keith FOLK, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 6, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
994 N.Y.S.2d 550
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7539

Citing Cases

Ortega v. Lee

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Chao v. Hollingshead

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…