From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oropeza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 25, 2022
338 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-1525

03-25-2022

Dallas Wayne OROPEZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Dallas Wayne Oropeza, Milton, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Dallas Wayne Oropeza, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the $3.00 cost assessed against each of the Counts, for a total of $12.00, pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2020), as Appellant was not convicted of an offense to which these fees apply. See Sorenson v. State , 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

SASSO, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oropeza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 25, 2022
338 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Oropeza v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dallas Wayne OROPEZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

Citations

338 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)