From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlando v. Medhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 27, 1993, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered November 8, 1993, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered November 8, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs are awarded one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case that the injured plaintiff suffered a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion and cross motion for summary judgment (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955; Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678; Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230; Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Orlando v. Medhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Orlando v. Medhurst

Case Details

Full title:ESPANA ORLANDO et al., Appellants, v. JOAN MEDHURST et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 861