From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oressey v. Oressey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 20, 1980
419 A.2d 1362 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)

Opinion

Submitted December 4, 1979.

Filed June 20, 1980.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Family Court Division, Lackawanna County, No. 727 of 1979, Walsh, J.

Roger Mattes, Scranton, for appellant.

Evelyn Oressey, for appellee, in pro. per., will not file a brief.

Before HESTER, MONTGOMERY and CIRILLO, JJ.

Judge VINCENT A. CIRILLO, of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.


This is a support proceeding involving appeals from two orders of the Court below. On April 9, 1979, the Court below filed a certification and order finding that the appellant was under a duty of support to his wife and minor children. The order was made ex parte without notice to the appellant and with no opportunity to be heard. The order was appealed to this Court by the appellant. Thereafter, the Court below held a hearing to which the appellant objected. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court entered an order of support for the two minor children, and that order was appealed to this Court.

The first order must be vacated for failure to follow procedural due process. The second order must be vacated because the Court below was without power or authority to proceed after the first order was appealed to this Court. The second order was, therefore, improper and a nullity: Driscoll v. Plymouth Twp., 13 Pa. Commw. 404, 320 A.2d 444 (1974).

The orders of the court below are hereby vacated.


Summaries of

Oressey v. Oressey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 20, 1980
419 A.2d 1362 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
Case details for

Oressey v. Oressey

Case Details

Full title:Evelyn ORESSEY v. Emil ORESSEY, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 20, 1980

Citations

419 A.2d 1362 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
419 A.2d 1362

Citing Cases

Nicolais v. Nicolais

We have nothing in the record to indicate otherwise. A support order cannot be drawn against a party who has…