From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O.M. v. Orange Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 25, 2013
1:09-CV-692 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

1:09-CV-692

03-25-2013

O.M., by and through his parents, NICOLE McWHIRTER AND ARRAN McWHIRTER, Plaintiffs, v. ORANGE COUNTY, N.C. BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant.


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 37) was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on February 22, 2013, was served on the parties. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636. After review, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

For the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) is DENIED;

2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 22) is DENIED.

_______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

O.M. v. Orange Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 25, 2013
1:09-CV-692 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

O.M. v. Orange Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:O.M., by and through his parents, NICOLE McWHIRTER AND ARRAN McWHIRTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

1:09-CV-692 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

S.F. v. Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

"Such an educational benefit must be provided to a disabled child in the least restrictive and appropriate…