From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Loughlin v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2003
2 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04682.

Decided December 15, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants, William Butler, Timothy Butler, and Wagner Kelly Management, Inc., appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated April 26, 2002, which, inter alia, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants William J. Butler and Wagner Kelly Management, Inc., on the issue of liability.

Milber Makris Plousadis Seiden, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Peter Seiden of counsel), for appellants.

Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal by Timothy Butler is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by the judgment appealed from ( see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs payable by the defendants.

Since the defendants Walter J. Butler and Wagner Kelly Management, Inc. (hereinafter the defendants), failed to object to the alleged defects in the jury charge, the issues raised with respect thereto are not preserved for appellate review ( see CPLR 4110-b; Laboda v. VJV Deve. Corp., 296 A.D.2d 441; Surjnarine v. Brathwaite, 290 A.D.2d 436). Moreover, viewing the evidence as a whole, there was a rational process by which the jury could have found in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of liability ( see Sam v. Zelman, 252 A.D.2d 550; Lipsius v. White, 91 A.D.2d 271, 276-277). Furthermore, the verdict on the issue of liability was not against the weight of the evidence ( see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

The defendants' remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Loughlin v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2003
2 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

O'Loughlin v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:JAMES O'LOUGHLIN, ETC., ET AL., respondents, v. WILLIAM BUTLER, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

Scudera v. Mahbubur

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff's motion. The plaintiff's contention that…

Rosalind v. Marine

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs. By failing to object…