From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Surjnarine v. Brathwaite

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 2002
290 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-09166

Submitted December 18, 2001.

January 14, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ritholtz, J.), dated July 17, 2000, which upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Joseph V. DiBlasi, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.

Neil L. Kanzer, Garden City, N.Y. (Cristina Prieto of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, SANDRA L. TOWNES, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to object to that part of the jury charge that he challenges on this appeal. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (CPLR 4110-b; CPLR 4017; CPLR 5501; see, Cavuto v. Lilledah, 161 A.D.2d 853; Petosa v. City of New York, 52 A.D.2d 919). In any event, the plaintiff's contention is without merit.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., ADAMS, TOWNES and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Surjnarine v. Brathwaite

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 2002
290 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Surjnarine v. Brathwaite

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SURJNARINE, appellant, v. DENISE E. BRATHWAITE, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 14, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

Smith v. J.C. Penney Company

The plaintiff failed to object to that part of the jury charge which he challenges on this appeal.…

Salcedo v. Ranch Estates

Moreover, the jury verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see Lolik v Big V…