From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Jan 16, 2013
No. C 11-04354 LB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)

Summary

finding evidence related to the period because Asperger's Disorder is "a developmental disorder, not a condition which suddenly appeared after hearing."

Summary of this case from Piracha v. Berryhill

Opinion

No. C 11-04354 LB

01-16-2013

LEONARD REY OLIVER, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.


JUDGMENT


[Re: ECF No. 17]

On January 16, 2013, the court granted Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, denied Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and remanded the action to the Social Security Administration. Summary Judgment Order, ECF No. 17. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant. The Clerk of Court shall close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Oliver v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Jan 16, 2013
No. C 11-04354 LB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)

finding evidence related to the period because Asperger's Disorder is "a developmental disorder, not a condition which suddenly appeared after hearing."

Summary of this case from Piracha v. Berryhill

finding the ALJs silent and erroneous rejection of treating providers' opinion not harmless where treating provider found the claimant experienced cognitive delay, directly conflicting with the ALJ's conclusion that the record contained no evidence of cognitive disorder, because "evidence of cognitive delay from a treating source" could cause a reasonable ALJ to reach a different disability determination

Summary of this case from Schwanz v. Colvin
Case details for

Oliver v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD REY OLIVER, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

No. C 11-04354 LB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)

Citing Cases

Van Gilder v. Colvin

To the extent this new evidence leads to a diagnosis also present during the time period of the ALJ's…

Schwanz v. Colvin

The Court finds that the ALJ's errors regarding opinion testimony were not harmless. As recognized in Shepard…