holding that incontestability clause precludes first manifest defense
Summary of this case from Jack v. the Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyNo. 95-7596.
August 19, 1997.
D.Del., 889 F.Supp. 770.
Affirmed.
holding that incontestability clause precludes first manifest defense
Summary of this case from Jack v. the Paul Revere Life Insurance Companydeferring analysis of duty to indemnify pending resolution and trial of facts in state court proceeding
Summary of this case from Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. FergusonFull title:Oglesby v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Aug 19, 1997
Fischer v. Massachusetts Cas. Ins. Co., 458 F. Supp. 939, 944 n. 1 (S.D. N.Y. 1978) (quoting 7 Williston on…
Sussex Auto Center, Inc. v. Optimum Choice, Inc.Additionally, Dr. Allen states that Sussex's failure to inform OCI of the change in the status of its…