From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ODDO v. PRESSER

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2004
358 N.C. 128 (N.C. 2004)

Opinion

No. 368A03

Filed 6 February 2004

Damages and Remedies — alienation of affections and criminal conversation — loss of tuition benefits for children

The decision of the Court of Appeals remanding this alienation of affections and criminal conversation case for a new trial on the issue of compensatory damages is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that evidence of plaintiff's lost tuition benefits for his children when plaintiff's employment as a Davidson College wrestling coach was terminated, allegedly because he was unable to function in the workplace due to mental anguish caused by defendant's actions, was not overly speculative and was properly admitted by the trial court.

Appeal by plaintiff and defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 158 N.C. App. 360, 581 S.E.2d 123 (2003), reversing in part, finding no error in part, and remanding for a new trial on the issue of compensatory damages a judgment entered 4 May 2001 by Judge Robert P. Johnston in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 November 2003.

Michelle D. Reingold for plaintiff-appellant and-appellee. Maxwell, Freeman Bowman, P.A., by James B. Maxwell, for defendant-appellant and-appellee.


As to the issue of compensatory damages, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals as to all remaining issues.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.


Summaries of

ODDO v. PRESSER

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2004
358 N.C. 128 (N.C. 2004)
Case details for

ODDO v. PRESSER

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS C. ODDO v. JEFFREY L. PRESSER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 2004

Citations

358 N.C. 128 (N.C. 2004)
592 S.E.2d 195

Citing Cases

In re Gallagher

Oddo v. Presser, 158 N.C.App. 360, 581 S.E.2d 123 (2003), aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds,…

In re A.N.R.

It is well settled that an objection preserves the issue for appeal only on the ground asserted at trial and…