From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-1830 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-1830 EDL

11-22-2011

THERESA M. O'BRIEN Plaintiff, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division JUAN D. WALKER (CSBN 208008) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Federal Defendant


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

JUAN D. WALKER (CSBN 208008)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Federal Defendant

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY

FILED DOCUMENT FROM DOCKET

ENTRY NOS. 41 AND 45.

Plaintiff Theresa M. O'Brien ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2011, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. As part of this motion, Exhibit B to the Walker Declaration (Docket Entry No. 41), had a page the was filed incorrectly. It contained a date of birth on Bates # EDS0046. Additionally, on the McPartland Declaration (Docket Entry No. 45), Exhibit B contained the last four of the SSN at CBP 0024, and Exhibit J contained a date of birth at CBP 0157. At Defendant's request, these docket links have been locked and remain locked. ACCORDINGLY, the parties hereby stipulate and request that Docket Entry Nos. 41 and 45 be removed from the CM/ECF system and case file so that the Declarations (along with properly redacted Exhibits) may be re-filed with the personal information properly redacted.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. SORGEN

By: ____

Joyce Kawahata

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MELINDA L. HAAG

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: ____

Juan D. Walker

In accord with the Northern District of California's General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed on this document.

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court ORDERS that the Walker Declaration (Docket Entry No. 41) and McPartland Declaration (Docket Entry No. 45) be removed from the CM/ECF system and case file so that the Exhibits may be re-filed with personal information redacted.

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

United State Magistrate Judge

___________


Summaries of

O'Brien v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-1830 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

O'Brien v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:THERESA M. O'BRIEN Plaintiff, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-1830 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)