From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Obeng-Amponsah v. Naiman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2014
Case No. CV 14-635 GHK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-635-GHK (PJW)

08-29-2014

KOFI OBENG-AMPONSAH, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL D. NAIMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motions to dismiss, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint be granted and that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: 8/29/14.

/s/_________

GEORGE H. KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Obeng-Amponsah v. Naiman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2014
Case No. CV 14-635 GHK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Obeng-Amponsah v. Naiman

Case Details

Full title:KOFI OBENG-AMPONSAH, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL D. NAIMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 14-635 GHK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Cutlip v. Deutche Bank National Trust Company

Courts routinely reject such attempts to overturn state court unlawful detainer judgments based upon similar…