From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Physicians LLP v. Ironwood Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2013
103 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-5

NEW YORK PHYSICIANS LLP, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. IRONWOOD REALTY CORPORATION, Defendant–Respondent.

Akerman Senterfitt LLP, New York (Scott M. Kessler of counsel), for appellant. Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York (Kevin J. Nash of counsel), for respondent.



Akerman Senterfitt LLP, New York (Scott M. Kessler of counsel), for appellant. Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York (Kevin J. Nash of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, ABDUS–SALAAM, FEINMAN, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 21, 2011, which ordered plaintiff, pending arbitration, to pay the base rent that had been in effect during the first renewal term, plus escalation and real estate taxes, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The parties' lease states that the fair market rent for the second renewal term shall be determined by arbitration if the parties cannot agree. The parties could not agree on fair market rent, and plaintiff tenant commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a Yellowstone injunction and a declaration that it is not in default of the lease. Upon staying the action pending arbitration, the motion court appropriately ordered plaintiff to pay the base rent that was in effect during the previous lease term plus escalation and real estate taxes ( see Andejo Corp. v. South St. Seaport Ltd. Partnership, 35 A.D.3d 174, 825 N.Y.S.2d 50 [1st Dept. 2006] ). Should plaintiff prevail in the arbitration, defendant shall be required to refund or offset any overcharge.


Summaries of

New York Physicians LLP v. Ironwood Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2013
103 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

New York Physicians LLP v. Ironwood Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK PHYSICIANS LLP, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. IRONWOOD REALTY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 5, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
959 N.Y.S.2d 176
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 688

Citing Cases

Dahl v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC

A tenant in possession should not be permitted to reap the benefits of occupancy, and at the same time, avoid…

322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Tibaldeo

Payment of use and occupancy pendente lite, "'accommodates the competing interests of the parties in…