From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez v. LaValley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 24, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-24

In the Matter of Manuel NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. Thomas LaVALLEY, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Manuel Nunez, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Manuel Nunez, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Torres v. Bezio, 92 A.D.3d 1053, 937 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2012];Matter of Calix v. Brown, 92 A.D.3d 1001, 937 N.Y.S.2d 639 [2012] ). While petitioner seeks to be relocated to the honor block where he was housed prior to the disciplinary determination, “ ‘inmates have no constitutional or statutory rights to their prior housing or programming status' ” (Matter of Valdez v. Fischer, 85 A.D.3d 1264, 1265, 923 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2011], quoting Matter of Rhodes v. Smith, 78 A.D.3d 1391, 1391, 910 N.Y.S.2d 699 [2010] ). Furthermore, his request for declaratory relief was not included in his petition and, in any event, is not authorized by CPLR 7804(g) ( see matter of applegate v. heath, 88 a.d.3d 699, 700, 930 n.y.S.2d 882 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $102.14.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, MALONE JR., STEIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nunez v. LaValley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 24, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Nunez v. LaValley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Manuel NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. Thomas LaVALLEY, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
944 N.Y.S.2d 710
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4061

Citing Cases

Watson v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

We additionally find petitioner's challenge to the denial of his FOIL request seeking a copy of respondent's…

Rucano v. Annucci

Otherwise, petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled and, as such, his petition…