From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calix v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-2

In the Matter of Nelson CALIX, Petitioner, v. William BROWN, as Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Nelson Calix, Napancoh, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondents.


Nelson Calix, Napancoh, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney *640 General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Doyle v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1189, 929 N.Y.S.2d 506 [2011]; Matter of Joseph v. LaClair, 87 A.D.3d 780, 780–781, 927 N.Y.S.2d 806 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

MERCURE, ACTING P.J., ROSE, LAHTINEN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Calix v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Calix v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Nelson CALIX, Petitioner, v. William BROWN, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 2, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 686
937 N.Y.S.2d 639

Citing Cases

Scott v. Prack

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Nunez v. LaValley

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…