From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norwood v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2009
No. CV 08-00172-ROS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 08-00172-ROS.

October 1, 2009


ORDER


Defendants have filed Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 27, 35) pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to exhaust prison administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff filed responses but, in an abundance of caution, the Court will give him an opportunity to submit additional filings.

NOTICE — WARNING TO PLAINTIFF THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO YOU BY THE COURT

Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n. 14 (9th Cir. 2003).

Defendants' Motions to Dismiss seek to have your case dismissed for failure to exhaust prison administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. When deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, the Court may consider evidence beyond your complaint, including sworn declarations and other admissible documentary evidence. Moreover, if Defendants produce admissible evidence demonstrating that you failed to exhaust available administrative remedies, your complaint will be dismissed without prejudice unless your response to Defendants' Motion includes admissible evidence sufficient to show that you exhausted all available administrative remedies or that no administrative remedies were available to you. Types of admissible evidence may include copies of your grievances, grievance responses and sworn declarations.

You must timely respond to all motions. The Court may, in its discretion, treat your failure to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) ( per curiam).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may file additional responses to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence, no later than October 23, 2009.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file replies within 15 days after service of Plaintiff's response.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court.


Summaries of

Norwood v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2009
No. CV 08-00172-ROS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Norwood v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Lynn Norwood, Plaintiff, v. M. Robinson, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2009

Citations

No. CV 08-00172-ROS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)