From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northvale Property Assoc. v. Osram Sylvania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09163

Argued November 14, 2002.

December 9, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover rent from a holdover tenant, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated August 21, 2001, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $50,756.25.

Breindel Ferstendig, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael P. Barnes and David L. Ferstendig of counsel), for appellant.

Stern Rindner, Goshen, N.Y. (Mark D. Stern and Jane M. Bloom of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The conclusions of the court after a nonjury trial are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be set aside unless they could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Islamic Ctr. of Harrison v. Islamic Science Found., 262 A.D.2d 362). In the instant case, there is no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination, as the evidence established that the defendant continued to use and occupy the demised premises after the lease expired.

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Northvale Property Assoc. v. Osram Sylvania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Northvale Property Assoc. v. Osram Sylvania

Case Details

Full title:NORTHVALE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LLC, respondent, v. OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 756

Citing Cases

R.A.C. Group, Inc. v. Board of Education

The purpose of the postemployment restrictions of New York City Charter § 2604 "is to prevent public servants…

Logan v. Johnson

n force for as long as he remained in possession of the premises ( see City of New York v Pennsylvania R.R.…