From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Islamic Center of Harrison v. Islamic Sci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued April 22, 1999

June 7, 1999

In an action, inter alia, for the removal of the individual defendants as the directors and trustees of the defendant religious corporations, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered June 1, 1998, which, inter alia, directed a reorganizational meeting of the defendant Islamic Cultural Center of New York, Inc., for the purpose of electing a new Board of Trustees, and directed that a Referee be appointed to hear and decide any membership issues related to that organization.

Lovett Gould, White Plains, N.Y. (Jane Bilus Gould of counsel), for appellants.

Regina F. Kelly, White Plains, N.Y., for respondents.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The issue presented is whether the individual plaintiffs were members of the Islamic Cultural Center of New York (hereinafter ICCNY), so as to have standing to bring the instant action. Following a trial, the Supreme Court rejected the defendants' claim that the named defendants were the only members of ICCNY. The court found that the individual plaintiffs, and others, who attended and contributed their time and money, constituted members of ICCNY under Religious Corporations Law § 195 Relig. Corp..

It is well settled that a decision rendered by a court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clear that its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v. Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499; Bucci v. Bucci, 231 A.D.2d 665; Richard's Home Ctr. Lbr. v. Kraft, 199 A.D.2d 254; Universal Leasing Servs. v. Flushing Hae Kwan Rest., 169 A.D.2d 829, 830). This is especially true when findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to credibility of witnesses ( see, Bucci v. Bucci, supra; Richard's Home Ctr. Lbr. v. Kraft, supra; Matter of Poggemeyer, 87 A.D.2d 822, 823). The record supports the Supreme Court's finding that the individual plaintiffs were members, under both the by-laws of ICCNY and the alternative definition of members in Religious Corporations Law § 195 Relig. Corp. which is based upon attendance and contributions ( see, Religious Corporations Law § 195 Relig. Corp.). Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the order.


Summaries of

Islamic Center of Harrison v. Islamic Sci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Islamic Center of Harrison v. Islamic Sci

Case Details

Full title:ISLAMIC CENTER OF HARRISON, INC., et al., respondents, v. ISLAMIC SCIENCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 94

Citing Cases

Venigalla v. Nori

In any event, the 1970 bylaws do not contravene the Religious Corporations Law. ( Matter of Kaminsky, 251 App…

Srour v. Bd. of Tr. of the Sephardic Congregation

Moreover, even though there is a general prohibition against judicial interference in issues concerning the…