From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noriega v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 2005
15 A.D.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5370

February 15, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered on or about June 14, 2004, which denied defendant King's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ., concur.


King's reliance on the emergency doctrine is improperly raised for the first time on appeal ( see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 292 AD2d 159). In any event, evidence that King was approximately three car-lengths behind plaintiff's vehicle, which was being driven erratically, when he observed that vehicle's brake lights, and that King may have been exceeding the posted speed limit when he struck plaintiff's vehicle, raise issues of fact precluding summary judgment in his favor ( see Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, 84 NY2d 835).


Summaries of

Noriega v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 2005
15 A.D.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Noriega v. King

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL NORIEGA, Respondent, v. MATTHEW C. KING, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 491

Citing Cases

Warley v. Grampp

denied19 N.Y.3d 805, 2012 WL 2036586 [2012] ). However, even assuming that this issue has been preserved for…

Brazell v. Wells Fargo

Indeed, there is no evidence that Wells Fargo made any effort to inspect the premises during the operative…