From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1994
84 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1994)

Opinion

Decided September 1, 1994

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Joseph P. Torraca, J.

Cynthia Feathers, Saratoga, and Eli B. Basch, Kingston, for Batoul Herbert and another, appellants.

Hurley, Fox, Selig Kelleher, Stony Point (Jeanne M. Hurley and Benjamin E. Selig of counsel), for Dorothy Mollicone, appellant.

Petito LaRose, Poughkeepsie (Keith V. LaRose of counsel), for Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc. and Errol K. Miller, respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), appeal by the Herberts dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order does not finally determine action No. 1 within the meaning of the Constitution. The order appealed from in action No. 1 does not resolve plaintiffs' claim against Dorothy Mollicone, and her cross claim against defendants Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc. and Errol K. Miller has never been dismissed. Accordingly, claims remain pending with respect to all parties in action No. 1. On appeal by plaintiff Dorothy Mollicone in action No. 2, order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion for summary judgment in action No. 2 denied, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division ( 202 A.D.2d 886, 888).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1994
84 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1994)
Case details for

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BATOUL HERBERT et al., Appellants, v. MORGAN DRIVE-A-WAY, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 1, 1994

Citations

84 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 127
641 N.E.2d 147

Citing Cases

Watson v. Peschel

( Akins v. Glens Falls City School Dist ., 53 N.Y.2d 325, 332, 441 N.Y.S.2d 644, 424 N.E.2d 531 [1981], rearg…

Pawlukiewicz v. Boisson

Further, he was obliged to see that which he should have seen with the proper use of his senses (see, Mohamed…