From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. CI 1-1138 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CI 1-1138 PSG

11-22-2011

DAVID NIN, JOE NIN, ANA NIN, and LINDA HOPKINS, Individually and as Successors-In-Interest to the Estate of JOSE NIN, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant,

MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division CLAIRE T. CORMIER (CSBN 154364) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant United States of America


MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

CLAIRE T. CORMIER (CSBN 154364)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant United States of America

STIPULATION AND [ xxxxxxxxx ]

ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL

DATES AND DEADLINES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court make the following modifications to the pretrial schedule for this case. This request is made due in part to the recent death in the family of defendant's counsel which has impaired the parties' ability to complete depositions by the current deadline.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current date ¦Proposed Date ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-------------------¦ ¦Fact discovery cutoff: ¦November 30,2011¦December 16,2011 ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-------------------¦ ¦Expert disclosures: ¦December 12,2011¦December 23, 2011 ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-------------------¦ ¦Rebuttal expert disclosures:¦January 6,2011 ¦January 20, 2012 ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-------------------¦ ¦Expert discovery cutoff: ¦January 20,2012 ¦February 3,2012 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------+

The parties agree that the fact discovery cutoff is extended only for depositions.

+--------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Last day to file motion: ¦January 31, 2012¦February 14,2012¦ +----------------------------+----------------+----------------¦ ¦Last day for motion hearing:¦March 6,2012 ¦March 20, 2012 ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+----------------¦ ¦Pretrial conference: ¦April 3, 2012 ¦unchanged ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+----------------¦ ¦Bench Trial: ¦April 16, 2012 ¦unchanged ¦ +--------------------------------------------------------------+

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

CLAIRE T. CORMIER

Assistant United States Attorney

STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES

KATHRYN A, STEBNER

KARMAN RATLIFF

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

(xxxxxxxxx ) ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Nin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. CI 1-1138 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Nin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID NIN, JOE NIN, ANA NIN, and LINDA HOPKINS, Individually and as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. CI 1-1138 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)