Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18-CV-00512-JDK
12-14-2018
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 2, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 5), recommending that Plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a basis for jurisdiction or allege a claim upon which relief can be granted. On October 5, 2018 Plaintiffs received a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Docket Nos. 6, 7. The Report and Recommendation informed Plaintiffs of their rights to object to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days, and further informed them that a failure to timely object shall bar "de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except on grounds of plain error, from appellate review of unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court." Docket No. 5 at 2 (citing Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996)). Since the service of the Report and Recommendation on October 5, 2018, Plaintiffs have not filed objections and the prescribed time period for doing so has passed.
Having reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Signed this
Dec 14, 2018
/s/_________
JEREMY D. KERNODLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE