Opinion
December 19, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about October 5, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion to set aside the jury's awards for past and future pain and suffering of $10,000 and $0, respectively, and directed a new trial on the issue of such damages unless defendant stipulated to increase the awards therefor to $75,000 and $50,000, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Kenneth M. Dalton, for plaintiff-respondent.
Stuart M. Bodoff, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach, Rubin, JJ.
According appropriate deference to the trial court's decision to set aside the jury's verdict (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 136-137), a fair interpretation of the evidence does not support the jury's verdict on past and future pain and suffering, caused by two herniated discs with nerve root impingement that, as implied by the jury's award for future medical expenses, will cause pain and suffering in the future (cf., Skow v. Jones, Lang Wooton Corp., 240 A.D.2d 194,lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 758).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.