From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Telephone Company v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1985
481 N.E.2d 255 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1985

Decided May 30, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Charles B. Lawrence, J.

Saul Scheier and Kevin M. Walsh for New York Telephone Company, appellant.

Cynthia Boyer Okrent for Brooklyn Union Gas Company, appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Trudi Mara Schleifer and Francis F. Caputo of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Donald J. Carbone for Frank Mascali Construction Corp. and others, respondents, precluded.

Jack Babchick for Andrews and Clark, respondent, precluded.

Howard J. McGratty for Mason Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., respondent, precluded.



Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice James F. Niehoff at the Appellate Division ( 95 A.D.2d 282). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

New York Telephone Company v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1985
481 N.E.2d 255 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

New York Telephone Company v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 30, 1985

Citations

481 N.E.2d 255 (N.Y. 1985)
481 N.E.2d 255
491 N.Y.S.2d 623

Citing Cases

N.Y. State Elec. v. State

The rationale for the rule, as aptly noted by the Court of Appeals, is that "the city should not be required…

N.Y. State Elec. & Gas Corp. v. State

"the [municipal entity] should not be required to recompense the company for the loss of a privilege which it…