Opinion
April 6, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The court was correct in characterizing the defendants' motion, denominated as one to "vacate or correct" a prior order and judgment, which, inter alia, granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, as a motion to reargue. Because no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue, this appeal must be dismissed (see, e.g., Conrad v. Conrad, 109 A.D.2d 772; FG Heating Co. v. Board of Educ., 103 A.D.2d 791).
Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.