From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conrad v. Conrad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 11, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.).


Appeal dismissed, with costs.

By an amended order dated August 25, 1983, Special Term granted plaintiff's motion to direct defendant to execute a deed transferring all of his right, title and interest in the marital premises to plaintiff upon a payment by plaintiff to defendant of $15,000. This direction was pursuant to a stipulation made in open court which was incorporated into the parties' judgment of divorce. Defendant had opposed the motion based on the theory that under the time limits provided by the stipulation, plaintiff's offer was untimely.

Defendant then moved for reargument. The basis for the motion was that the court misconstrued the stipulation, which he claimed to be ambiguous, and that under the facts presented, the court could not, under the law, construe plaintiff's offer as being timely made. Special Term denied defendant's motion for reargument and defendant appeals from that order.

It is well settled that denials of motions for reargument are not appealable ( F G Heating Co. v. Board of Educ., 103 A.D.2d 791; Smith v. Smith, 97 A.D.2d 932; Roy v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 85 A.D.2d 832; Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558).

Despite defendant's attempt in his brief to label his motion as one for renewal, he was correct when he originally labeled it as one for reargument ( Roy v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., supra; Sunbeam Corp. v. Morris Distrib. Co., 55 A.D.2d 722). The appeal must therefore be dismissed. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conrad v. Conrad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Conrad v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:TERESA CONRAD, Respondent, v. WALTER CONRAD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

New Sans Souci Nursing Home v. DeBuono

The court was correct in characterizing the defendants' motion, denominated as one to "vacate or correct" a…

Matter of New York State Council v. Lifset

Additionally, we cannot conclude that the $1,000 penalty was so disproportionate to the offense, in light of…