From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0313 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0313 GEB KJM P.

October 19, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a supplement to his complaint. However, Local Rule 15-220 requires that complaints be complete in themselves without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes a previous complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Therefore, plaintiff's October 6, 2009 supplement to his complaint shall be placed in the court's file and disregarded.

Plaintiff is informed that if, in the future, he files an amended complaint, he must also file a motion seeking leave to amend under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the amended complaint will be disregarded.


Summaries of

Neal v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0313 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Neal v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:SEAN BAPTISTE NEAL, Plaintiff, v. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0313 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)