From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naranjo v. Star Corrugated Box Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 2005
22 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-04181.

October 11, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Fort Cica Roofing General Contracting, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated March 9, 2004, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his causes of action to recover damages based on violations of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it, and denied its cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3108 for a commission to take the deposition of a nonparty witness.

Tromello, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (James S. Kehoe of counsel), for appellant.

Before: S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on his causes of action to recover damages based on violations of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against the appellant, Fort Cica Roofing General Contracting, Inc. ( see Cun-En Lin v. Holy Family Monuments, 18 AD3d 800). In opposition, the appellant failed to demonstrate that facts essential to justify opposition to the motion existed but could not be stated without obtaining the deposition of an out-of-state witness ( see CPLR 3212 [f]; Baron v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 143 AD2d 792).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Naranjo v. Star Corrugated Box Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 2005
22 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Naranjo v. Star Corrugated Box Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER NARANJO, Respondent, v. STAR CORRUGATED BOX CO., INC., Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7508
802 N.Y.S.2d 507

Citing Cases

Norero v. 99-105 Third Avenue Realty, LLC

Here, the plaintiff established, prima facie, that he was not provided with proper protection under Labor Law…