From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narain v. MAC Cosmetics

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
1:20-CV-00660-NONE-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-CV-00660-NONE-SKO

09-24-2021

CHERYL NARAIN, Plaintiff, v. MAC COSMETICS, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants.

SODHI LAW GROUP JAKRUN S. SODHI SBN 200851 AMEET S. BIRRING SBN 297118 Attorneys for Plaintiff CHERYL NARAIN JACKSON LEWIS P.C. NATHAN W. AUSTIN SBN 219672 BAILEY MCCABE SBN 322098 Attorneys for Defendants MAC COSMETICS


Complaint Filed 12.19.19

Removed 05.11.20

SODHI LAW GROUP

JAKRUN S. SODHI SBN 200851

AMEET S. BIRRING SBN 297118

Attorneys for Plaintiff CHERYL NARAIN

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

NATHAN W. AUSTIN SBN 219672

BAILEY MCCABE SBN 322098

Attorneys for Defendants MAC COSMETICS

JOINT STIPULATION AND TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

DOC. 11

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16b4 and Local Rules 143 and 144d, and for good cause shown, Plaintiff CHERYL NARAIN “Plaintiff” and Defendant MAC Cosmetics “Defendant”, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows

1. This case was filed on December 12, 2019 in Stanislaus Superior Court No. CV-19-007574.

2. There was a delay in service of the complaint and Defendant removed the case on May 11, 2020 Docket No. 1.

3. The parties have actively litigated this case.

4. As a result of Defendant's continued investigation into the claims alleged by Plaintiff, the parties have recently become aware of facts that may lead to the resolution of this case and be dispositive as to the claims alleged in this action.

5. In an effort to conserve judicial resources and those of the parties, counsel are meeting and conferring to discuss these facts, the relative merits of the claims at issue in this action, and whether this action should be dismissed by stipulation.

6. Plaintiff's counsel cannot meet with Plaintiff until September 21, 2021 to discuss the merits of this matter.

7. The deadline for filing dispositive and non-dispositive motions is September 21, 2021, and a Settlement conference is set for December 9, 2021 Doc. No. 7.

8. Defendant believes there are strong grounds for filing a dispositive motions in this action.

9. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement about dismissing this action, the parties agree that Defendant's right to file a dispositive motions should not be prejudiced by an unavoidable delay in the parties' meet and confer efforts.

10. Similarly, the parties wish to avoid burdening the Court with unnecessary motion if the parties are able to resolve this dispute amongst themselves by stipulation.

11. The parties are requesting that the deadlines for filing dispositive and non-dispositive motions be continued for sixty 60 days, or as otherwise provided by the Court, while the parties meet and confer to discuss the potential voluntary dismissal of this matter. If the parties' meet and confer efforts are unsuccessful, Defendant will file dispositive motions.

12. The parties will not be prejudiced by a continuance of the current pre-trial deadlines. NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, jointly propose and stipulate to the following the deadlines in the Pretrial Scheduling Order previously set forth by the Court shall be revised as follows, or set on such other dates as the Court determines

Event

Current Date

Proposed New Date

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline

September 27, 2021

November 26, 2021

Dispositive Motion Deadline

September 27, 2021

November 26, 2021

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' above stipulation (Doc. 11), and for good cause shown, the deadlines in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) are hereby MODIFIED as follows:

Event

Prior Date

Continued Date

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing

September 27, 2021

November 29, 2021

Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing

October 27, 2021

December 29, 2021

Dispositive Motion Filing

September 27, 2021

November 29, 2021

Pretrial Conference

February 23, 2022

April 27, 2022, at 8:15 a.m.

The Court has continued the pretrial conference to allow adequate time for the Court to rule on the parties' dispositive motions and to permit the parties sufficient time to prepare their pretrial submissions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Narain v. MAC Cosmetics

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
1:20-CV-00660-NONE-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Narain v. MAC Cosmetics

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL NARAIN, Plaintiff, v. MAC COSMETICS, a Delaware Limited Liability…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

1:20-CV-00660-NONE-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)