From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napoli v. Napoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1979
67 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

February 13, 1979


In an action to recover damages for fraud, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 28, 1978, as denied his motion, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (subd [a], par 3), to be relieved from a prior judgment of the same court, dated November 19, 1974, which was in favor of defendants. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff had not provided any concrete evidence to support his contention that a specified document received in evidence at the trial had been altered by some of the defendants and that plaintiff's very same arguments on this issue had either been advanced unsuccessfully, or could have been advanced, at the trial of this action. With respect to the other grounds raised by plaintiff in support of his motion, Special Term correctly held that plaintiff had adequate opportunity to raise them during the course of the trial, and had failed to do so. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion to be relieved from a prior judgment was properly denied. Damiani, J.P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Napoli v. Napoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1979
67 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Napoli v. Napoli

Case Details

Full title:IGNATIUS J. NAPOLI, Appellant, v. ANTHONY NAPOLI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1979

Citations

67 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Sunset West LLC v. Sutphin Management Corp.

Therefore, defendants fail to establish the kind of fraud contemplated by CPLR 5015(a)(3) and cannot succeed…

Sunset W. LLC v. Sutphin Mgt. Corp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51002(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 5/22/2009)

Furthermore, as argued by plaintiffs, defendants cannot avail themselves of CPLR 5015(a)(3) if the fraud…