From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors

California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division
Sep 4, 2001
No. A089095 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2001)

Opinion


Page 15f

92 Cal.App.4th 15f NAPA CITIZENS FOR HONEST GOVERNMENT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendant and Appellant. A089095. California Court of Appeal, First District, First Division September 4, 2001

[Modification of opinion (91 Cal.App.4th 342, 110 Cal.Rptr.2d 579) on denial of petition for rehearing.]

This modification requires movement of text affecting pages 375-376 of the bound volume report.

STEIN, Acting P. J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 3, 2001, be modified as follows:

On page 2, the second sentence of last paragraph [91 Cal.App.4th 353, advance report, 1st par., lines 3-6] is modified to read: "This meant, among other things, that the County was required to prepare and circulate an environmental impact report, or EIR and was encouraged to hold public hearings prior to certifying the EIR and adopting the 1986 Specific Plan."

On page 3, the last sentence of the second full paragraph [91 Cal.App.4th 353, advance report, 3d par., lines 8-11] is modified to read: "At the completion of these proceedings, the County, on October 20, 1998, adopted the Updated Specific Plan, after certifying the FSEIR, which was comprised of the draft subsequent EIR as modified by the Supplement and the Addendum."

On page 16 [91 Cal.App.4th 364, advance report (correction made in adv. rep. opn.)], the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that the word "potential" appears in place of the word "potentially."

On page 30 [91 Cal.App.4th 375, advance report], footnote 9, the first sentence is modified to read: "For example, Policy Guideline 2a(2) concerns the construction of three grade separated interchanges at the intersections of State Route 29 and State Route 12, State Route 221 and the American Canyon Road."

In all other respects the opinion remains the same. This modification does not effect a change in judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors

California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division
Sep 4, 2001
No. A089095 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2001)
Case details for

Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors

Case Details

Full title:NAPA CITIZENS FOR HONEST GOVERNMENT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v…

Court:California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division

Date published: Sep 4, 2001

Citations

No. A089095 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2001)