From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-142-KJM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-142-KJM-KJN PS

09-28-2021

SHANNON O. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., Defendant.


ORDER

On January 28, 2021 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No. objections were filed by the deadline, however, plaintiff did file objections submitted after the deadline. (ECF No. 4.) The court exercises its discretion to consider the objections and so reviews de novo those portions of the findings and recommendations to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).

In so doing the court construes the Army order attached to the complaint as generally signalling plaintiff's need for more time to prepare legal filings.

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, ECF No. 3, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case


Summaries of

Murphy v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-142-KJM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Murphy v. Fed. Express Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON O. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-142-KJM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)