From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulder v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-29 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-29

08-07-2018

JEREMY D. MULDER, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On July 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 21) recommending that Defendant's partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, it hereby is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is DENIED, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. August 7, 2018

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Mulder v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-29 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Mulder v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY D. MULDER, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-29 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2018)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Lab. Corp. of Am.

Violations of WESCA also generally provide a basis for standing because they necessarily involve violations…