From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moulder v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 29, 1997
226 Ga. App. 608 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

A97A1754.

DECIDED MAY 29, 1997.

Civil rights violation. Gilmer Superior Court. Before Judge Langford.

Robert K. Moulder, Sr., pro se.

Robert K. Moulder, Jr., pro se. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Ralston Panter, David E. Ralston, Terry L. Long, for appellees.


Robert K. Moulder, Sr. and Robert K. Moulder, Jr., both of whom are prison inmates, filed this civil action in Gilmer County Superior Court seeking redress for alleged violations of their civil rights by various public officials and appellants' former attorney. In orders entered October 4 and 14, 1996, the superior court dismissed the defendants from the suit on various grounds. On November 1, 1996, the appellants filed a notice of appeal. Held:

Generally, an order granting a motion to dismiss is directly appealable. However, the appellants brought this civil action and the appeal therefrom while prison inmates. The Prison Litigation Reform Act, therefore, applies. OCGA § 42-12-3 (1). The Act provides that "[a]ppeals of all actions filed by prisoners shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35," that is, by application requesting a discretionary appeal. OCGA § 42-12-8.

In this case, the appellants failed to follow the discretionary appeal procedure required by law. "The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith." Boyle v. State of Georgia, 190 Ga. App. 734 ( 380 S.E.2d 57) (1989). Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Beasley and Smith, JJ., concur.


DECIDED MAY 29, 1997.


Summaries of

Moulder v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 29, 1997
226 Ga. App. 608 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Moulder v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:MOULDER et al. v. REILLY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 29, 1997

Citations

226 Ga. App. 608 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
487 S.E.2d 142

Citing Cases

Ridley v. Estate of Dickerson

"The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an application for appeal…

Jatta v. State

"The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an application for appeal…