From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Boyles

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 10, 2020
2020-UP-177 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 10, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-177

06-10-2020

Carmen Morgan, Appellant, v. Yvonne Murray Boyles, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2018-001809

Carmen Morgan, pro se, of Columbia. Yvonne Murray Boyles, pro se, of Columbia.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2020

Appeal From Richland County Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

Carmen Morgan, pro se, of Columbia.

Yvonne Murray Boyles, pro se, of Columbia.

PER CURIAM:

Carmen Morgan appeals the circuit court's order affirming the decision of the Resolution of Fee Disputes Board (the Board). Because this court lacks appellate jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Board, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 416, SCACR, Rule 20 (stating a "party aggrieved by the final decision of the Board may appeal the decision to the circuit court in the county where the principal place of practice of the attorney is located"); Wright v. Dickey, 370 S.C. 517, 521, 636 S.E.2d 1, 3 (Ct. App. 2006) (concluding "there is no appeal from a decision of the Resolution of Fee Disputes Board of the South Carolina Bar beyond the circuit court as set forth in Rule 416, SCACR, Rule 20").

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Boyles

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 10, 2020
2020-UP-177 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Morgan v. Boyles

Case Details

Full title:Carmen Morgan, Appellant, v. Yvonne Murray Boyles, Respondent. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 10, 2020

Citations

2020-UP-177 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 10, 2020)