From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

More-Yossef v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2012
486 F. App'x 672 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 09-71690 Agency No. A072-301-429

10-18-2012

AVRAHAM MORE-YOSSEF, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Department of Homeland Security


Submitted October 11, 2012

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior District Judge.

The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
--------

Avraham More-Yossef, a native and citizen of Israel, petitions for review of an order of the Department of Homeland Security reinstating a June 10, 2007, order of removal against More-Yossef. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review reinstatements of prior orders of removal, see Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 484, 495-98 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

The reinstatement order complies with immigration regulations. See 8 C.F.R. § 241.8.

We lack jurisdiction to consider More-Yossef's collateral challenge to his prior expedited removal order. See Garcia de Rincon v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 539 F.3d 1133, 1136, 1138-39 (9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.


Summaries of

More-Yossef v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2012
486 F. App'x 672 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

More-Yossef v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:AVRAHAM MORE-YOSSEF, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

486 F. App'x 672 (9th Cir. 2012)