From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moormans&sSingleton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Texas
Jan 30, 1963
364 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. 1963)

Opinion


364 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. 1963) MOORMAN & SINGLETON et al., Petitioners, v. Linda Jane SIMMONS, a Minor, by next friend, Respondent. MOORMAN & SINGLETON et al., Petitioners, v. Edward Gale LOONEY, a Minor, by next friend, Respondent. MOORMAN & SINGLETON, a Partnership, et al., Petitioners, v. Jerry Don FLOYD et al., Respondents. MOORMAN & SINGLETON, a Partnership, et al., Petitioners, v. Joe Bryant FINCHER, a Minor, by and through his next friend and father, Haskel Ray Fincher, Respondent. No. A-9297. Supreme Court of Texas. January 30, 1963

Thompson, Knight, Wright & Simmons, Dallas, Pinkney Grisson, Frank Finn, Jr., and George C. Chapman, Dallas, for petitioners.

Clyde Elliott, Jr., Canton, Woodruff, Hill, Bader & Kendall, Dallas, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 360 S.W.2d 548, which is in conflict with the 1959 decision of the Eastland Court of Civil Appeals in Texas Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Adams, 331 S.W.2d 240, error dismissed. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is refused.


Summaries of

Moormans&sSingleton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Texas
Jan 30, 1963
364 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. 1963)
Case details for

Moormans&sSingleton v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:MOORMANs&sSINGLETON et al., Petitioners, v. Linda Jane SIMMONS, a Minor…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Jan 30, 1963

Citations

364 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. 1963)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Flores

We have examined the record in this cause and fundamental error is not shown. We therefore conclude that this…

Moody v. Moody

Under such circumstances, appellee is entitled to have his motion to dismiss the appeal granted. Rules 414,…