From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moorman Singleton v. Simmons

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Oct 4, 1962
360 S.W.2d 548 (Tex. Civ. App. 1962)

Opinion

Nos. 4037-4040.

September 21, 1962. Rehearing Denied October 4, 1962.

Appeal from the 86th District Court of Van Zandt County, Thomas H. Crofts, J.

Thompson, Knight, Wright Simmons, Frank Finn, Jr., Pinkney Grissom, Dallas, for appellants.

Wynne Wynne, Wills Point, for appellee Linda Jane Simmons.

L. F. Sanders, Canton, for appellee Edward Gale Looney.

Clyde Elliott, Jr., Canton, Bert Bader, Dallas, for appellee Jerry Don Floyd.

C. L. Stanford, Canton, for appellee John Bryant Fincher.


The appeals in these plea of privilege cases were dismissed because appellants filed no briefs within the time prescribed by Rule 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. On motion for rehearing appellants insist no briefs are necessary in appeals from interlocutory orders, and that Rule 414 has no application thereto. They cite cases holding no briefs are necessary in appeals from orders on temporary injunction.

The basis of these holdings is that Rule 385(d) provides that where the appeal is from an order granting or refusing a temporary injunction, the "cause may be heard in the Court of Civil Appeals" on the bill, answer, affidavits and evidence admitted. Subd. (d) of the Rule is limited in its application, and does not refer to appeals from all interlocutory orders. The two Court of Civil Appeals decisions to the contrary appear to derive their determination from the opinions in the temporary injunction cases.

We think Rule 415 authorizing dismissal for failure to file briefs applies to these appeals. Schkade v. Independent-Eastern Torpedo Co., Tex.Civ.App., 168 S.W.2d 281; Bloss v. Alston, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 416; Kirby Lumber Corp. v. Walters, Tex.Civ.App., 277 S.W.2d 796, 801; Fitch v. International Harvester Co., Tex.Civ.App., 350 S.W.2d 395, per curiam, Tex.Sup., 354 S.W.2d 372; and see Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Motions for rehearing are overruled.


Summaries of

Moorman Singleton v. Simmons

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Oct 4, 1962
360 S.W.2d 548 (Tex. Civ. App. 1962)
Case details for

Moorman Singleton v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:MOORMAN SINGLETON et al., Appellants, v. Linda Jane SIMMONS, a Minor, by…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco

Date published: Oct 4, 1962

Citations

360 S.W.2d 548 (Tex. Civ. App. 1962)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Flores

We have examined the record in this cause and fundamental error is not shown. We therefore conclude that this…

Moormans&sSingleton v. Simmons

PER CURIAM.        We agree with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 360 S.W.2d…