From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Coates

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 13, 2011
Case No. 8:11-cv-929-T-30AEP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-cv-929-T-30AEP.

July 13, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court, sua sponte, for review of the file. Plaintiff, a Florida prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint on April 27, 2011 (Dkt. 1), and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2). The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 5). The Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint (Dkt. 4). Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on June 6, 2011 (Dkt. 9).

On June 14, 2011, the Court issued an order instructing the Clerk of the Court to send Plaintiff the waiver of service forms (Dkt. 10). The order also instructed Plaintiff to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the order (Id.). Plaintiff was warned that failure to timely return the forms "will result in dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, without further notice." (emphasis in original). The order was mailed to Plaintiff's address of record, but it was returned to the Clerk as undeliverable. The order was resent to Plaintiff, but again it was returned to the Clerk as undeliverable.

By neglecting to keep the Court informed of his current address, Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action. Since mail sent to Plaintiff's last known address has been returned as undeliverable, it would be futile to send an order to show cause to Plaintiff at that address. A case cannot, however, be allowed to linger on the Court's docket indefinitely.

Local Rule 3.10(a) (M.D. Fla.) provides that "[w]henever it appears that any case is not being diligently prosecuted the Court may, on motion of any party or on its own motion, enter an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed, and if no satisfactory cause is shown, the case may be dismissed by the Court for want of prosecution."

ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10(a) (M.D. Fla.). The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action under a new case number. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, and close this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Moore v. Coates

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 13, 2011
Case No. 8:11-cv-929-T-30AEP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Moore v. Coates

Case Details

Full title:WADIE MOORE, JR., Plaintiff, v. JIM COATES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 8:11-cv-929-T-30AEP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2011)