From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS.

December 8, 2010


ORDER


On December 1, 2010, plaintiff Teresa Moore filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(1). Dckt. No. 13. The notice of voluntary dismissal states that Moore "give[s] notice that [this] action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bank of America, et alia." Id.

It is unclear from Moore's filing whether only plaintiff Moore seeks the voluntary dismissal or whether plaintiff Gertrude Vizmanos also seeks the dismissal. It is also unclear whether plaintiff(s) seek to dismiss only defendant Bank of America or whether plaintiff(s) seek to dismiss all defendants. Therefore, within seven days from the date this order is served, plaintiff(s) shall file a revised notice of voluntary dismissal clarifying the issues addressed herein. Failure to file a revised notice of voluntary dismissal, as ordered herein, will be deemed a withdrawal of the December 1, 2010 notice of voluntary dismissal.

To the extent plaintiff(s) seek to dismiss defendant Ed Turner, because defendant Turner has filed an answer to plaintiffs' complaint, Dckt. No. 12, any such dismissal would need to be by stipulation or by court order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A); 41(a)(2).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 8, 2010.


Summaries of

Moore v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Moore v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:TERESA J. MOORE, GERTRUDE V. VIZMANOS, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)