From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moon v. Rush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2012
2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD

03-23-2012

VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib & McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Plaintiff, v. DAVID H. RUSH, MARK A. HABIB, and JAMES P. MCKENNA, Defendants. DAVID H. RUSH, Counter-claimant, v. VIRGINIA C. MOON, Counter-defendant.


ORDER

This matter is deemed suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).

On February 10, 2012, Counter-defendant Virginia C. Moon ("Moon") filed a motion to dismiss Counter-claimant David H. Rush's ("Rush") Counter-claims. (ECF No. 11.) However, Rush filed his First Amended Counter-claims on March 2, 2012. Since Moon's dismissal motion does not concern Rush's operative counter-claims, the motion is denied as moot and the hearing scheduled for April 2, 2012 is vacated.

__________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Moon v. Rush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2012
2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Moon v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)