From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II
May 22, 2013
2013 Ark. App. 350 (Ark. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. E-12-317

05-22-2013

ETHAN O. MOODY APPELLANT v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, AND ARKANSAS HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT APPELLEES

Larry J. Steele, PLC, by: Phyllis A. Edwards, for appellee Artee Williams, Director, Arkansas Department of Workforce Services.


APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

BOARD OF REVIEW

[NO. 2011-AT-00508]


REBRIEFING ORDERED


WAYMOND M. BROWN , Judge

Appellant appeals from the Board of Review's denial of benefits to him under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-514(a) on finding that the claimant was discharged from his last work for misconduct in connection with the work. We order rebriefing.

(Repl. 2012).

Rule 4-2(a)(5) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals states that "[t]he appellant shall create an abstract of the material parts of all the transcripts (stenographically reported material) in the record." Rule 4-2(a)(5)(A) states the following:

Exhibits (other than transcripts) shall not be abstracted. Instead, material exhibits shall be copied and placed in the addendum. If an exhibit referred to in the abstract is in the addendum, then the abstract shall include a reference to the addendum page where the exhibit appears.
In his abstract, appellant includes a section titled "Excerpts From Exhibits" in which he abstracts seven documents, despite the above prohibition.

Furthermore, Rule 4-2(a)(8) states that "[t]he addendum shall contain true and legible copies of the non-transcript documents in the record on appeal that are essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to decide the issues on appeal." Appellant's addendum includes only the decision from the Board of Review and fails to include the abstracted exhibits in his addendum where such documents belong.

The appellant is ordered to file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum that comply with Rule 4-2 within 15 days of the date of this opinion. The clerk shall set the briefing schedule accordingly. We remind counsel that the examples we have noted are not to be taken as an exhaustive list of deficiencies. Counsel is strongly encouraged to carefully review the rules to ensure that no other deficiencies exist. Failure to file a compliant brief within 15 days could result in the Board of Review's decision being summarily affirmed for noncompliance with our rules. After service of the substituted abstract, brief, and addendum, appellee Department of Workforce Services shall have an opportunity to revise or supplement its brief in the time prescribed by the court, or to rely on the briefs previously filed in this appeal.

Appellee Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department did not submit a brief in this matter.
--------

Rebriefing ordered.

GLADWIN, CJ., and HIXSON, J., agree.

Larry J. Steele, PLC, by: Larry J. Steele, for appellant.

Phyllis A. Edwards, for appellee Artee Williams, Director, Arkansas Department of Workforce Services.


Summaries of

Moody v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II
May 22, 2013
2013 Ark. App. 350 (Ark. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Moody v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

Case Details

Full title:ETHAN O. MOODY APPELLANT v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES…

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II

Date published: May 22, 2013

Citations

2013 Ark. App. 350 (Ark. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Moody v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

2012). Moody v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs., 2013 Ark. App. 350. Appellant has failed to cure the…

Law Offices of Craig L. Cook v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs.

Failure to file a compliant brief within fifteen days could result in the Board's decision being summarily…