From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohamed v. Unifruitco S.S. Co., Ltd., United Fruit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss complaint modified by adding thereto a provision that the question of fact as to the execution of the general release by plaintiff be tried by a jury, the findings to be reported to the court for its action as provided in Civil Practice Rule 108; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. ( Galanti v. Brady Gioe, Inc., 211 App. Div. 858; Rizzuto v. U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 213 id. 326.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Mohamed v. Unifruitco S.S. Co., Ltd., United Fruit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Mohamed v. Unifruitco S.S. Co., Ltd., United Fruit

Case Details

Full title:WAT SUMMER MOHAMED, Respondent, v. UNIFRUITCO STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Barker v. Conley

The order was affirmed by this court ( 243 N.Y. 599, 600), although in answering the certified question,…