From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GALANTI v. BRADY GIOE, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

December, 1924.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint modified by adding thereto a provision that the question of fact as to the execution of the general release by the plaintiff be tried by a jury, the findings to be reported to the court for its action as provided in Civil Practice Rule 108; and as so modified order affirmed, without costs. On the facts disclosed in the papers, the issue as to the execution of the alleged release in no way involves the main issue, and the necessity for what would be in effect two trials of the same issue is not presented. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

See Rules Civ. Prac. rule 108; Id. rule 107, subd. 7. — [REP.


Summaries of

GALANTI v. BRADY GIOE, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

GALANTI v. BRADY GIOE, INC

Case Details

Full title:JACK GALANTI, Respondent, v. BRADY GIOE, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1924

Citations

211 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Citing Cases

Rizzuto v. U.S. Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corp.

In this case it seems to me that rule 108 should have been followed by the Special Term. We had a similar…

Mohamed v. Unifruitco S.S. Co., Ltd., United Fruit

Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss complaint modified by adding thereto a provision that the…