From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohamed v. Com., Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 2009
982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 356 MAL 2009.

October 16, 2009.

Petition No. 356 MAL 2009 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Prior report: Pa.Cmwlth., 973 A.2d 453.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the interlocutory order of the Commonwealth Court, dated May 4, 2009, is GRANTED. We assume plenary jurisdiction over Petitioner's appeal as a sua sponte exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction. 42 Pa.C.S. § 726; Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380, 899 A.2d 1103, 1108 (2006). The issue on appeal, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Petitioner's request for relief under 42 Pa.C.S. § 933(a) and transferring the matter to the court of common pleas?


Summaries of

Mohamed v. Com., Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 2009
982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Mohamed v. Com., Dept. of Transp

Case Details

Full title:Maher S. Ahmed MOHAMED, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 16, 2009

Citations

982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)
982 A.2d 1218