From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Cnty. of Monterey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
NO. C 08-01166 JW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C 08-01166 JW

11-15-2011

Daniel J. Mitchell, Plaintiff, v. County of Monterey, et al., Defendants.


ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE RE. SETTLEMENT

On September 27, 2011, the parties in this case informed the Court that they have "reached a conditional settlement." (See Docket Item No. 190.) On September 30, 2011, in light of the settlement, the Court vacated all trial and pretrial dates and set November 21, 2011 for a Status Conference re. Settlement. (See Docket Item No. 191.) The Court stated that "[i]n the event that the terms of the settlement are finalized and proper authorization is given by the County earlier than the status date, the parties shall inform the Court by way of a Status Statement and select a date for Preliminary Approval of Settlement in accordance with the Court's calendar." (Id. at 1.)

On November 11, 2011, the parties filed a Joint Status Conference Statement contending that the settlement agreement "has been approved by the County of Monterey Board of Supervisors," but that Plaintiffs' counsel is still "in the process" of "obtaining the last few remaining signatures to the settlement agreement from the individual Plaintiffs." (See Docket Item No. 192 at 1-2.) The parties contend that they "anticipate filing a complete settlement agreement with all signatures with the Court on or before November 21, 2011." (Id. at 2.)

In light of the parties' contentions, the Court finds good cause to CONTINUE the Status Conference re. Settlement to December 5, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or before November 23, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Status Conference Statement setting forth, inter alia, the status of the parties for finalizing the settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize the settlement. In the event that the terms of the settlement are finalized earlier than the status date, the parties shall inform the Court by way of a Status Statement and select a date for Preliminary Approval of Settlement in accordance with the Court's calendar.

In this event, the December 5 Status Conference re. Settlement shall be automatically vacated.

JAMES WARE

United States District Chief Judge

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

David Emilio Mastagni davidm@mastagni.com

David Philip Mastagni dmastagni@mastagni.com

Isaac Sean Stevens istevens@mastagni.com

James Byron Carr jcarr@mastagni.com

James Byron Carr jcarr@mastagni.com

William K. Rentz rentzb@co.monterey.ca.us

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: JW Chambers

Susan Imbriani

Courtroom Deputy


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Cnty. of Monterey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
NO. C 08-01166 JW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Cnty. of Monterey

Case Details

Full title:Daniel J. Mitchell, Plaintiff, v. County of Monterey, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

NO. C 08-01166 JW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)