From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minor v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jan 28, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv251 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv251

01-28-2020

CHESTER LEE MINOR, #0497713 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Chester Lee Minor, a former prisoner within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking release onto mandatory supervision. The cause of action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge, the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the petition.

On December 30, 2019, Judge Mitchell issued a Report (Docket no. 7), recommending that Petitioner's federal habeas petition be denied as moot because he has been released from imprisonment. She also recommended that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte. A copy of this Report was sent to Petitioner at his address, with an acknowledgment card. To date, however, no objections to the Report have been filed.

Because objections to Judge Mitchell's Report have not been filed, Petitioner is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (holding that where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law"). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 7) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Further, it is

ORDERED that Petitioner's federal habeas petition is DENIED as moot. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability sua sponte. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions that may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of January, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Minor v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jan 28, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv251 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Minor v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER LEE MINOR, #0497713 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv251 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

McLean v. Dir. TDCJ-CID

Minor v. Dir., TDCJ-CID, No. 6:19CV251, 2019 WL 7790437, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 30, 2019) (“Because Minor has…