From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miloslavich v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1315-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1315-FCD-CMK-P.

May 19, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On March 27, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

Petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections, but none have been filed. Petitioner did, however, file a request to file a reply brief, which is denied as untimely.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted;

3. This action is dismissed; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal and close this file.


Summaries of

Miloslavich v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1315-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Miloslavich v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE CHARLES MILOSLAVICH, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 19, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1315-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)