From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Hunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1810
5 N.C. 394 (N.C. 1810)

Opinion

July Term, 1810.

Previous to the act of 1809, ch. 8. a debtor imprisoned for debt was entitled to the benefit of the act for the relief of insolvent debtors by remaining within the prison bounds (bond having been given for the keeping thereof) for the space of twenty days.

THIS was a motion for judgment upon a penal bond given by the defendants, conditioned to be void if a debtor who had been arrested upon a capias ad satisfaciendum should keep within the prison bounds. The debtor, after giving due notice to the creditor at whose instance he had been arrested, took the oath of insolvency and went at large; and this having occurred previous to the passage of the act of 1809, ch. 8, it was submitted to this Court, Whether the debtor was entitled to the benefit of the act for the relief of insolvent debtors by remaining for the space of twenty days within the prison bounds.

This act declares that any person who thereafter should be imprisoned for debt should not be permitted to take the oath of insolvent debtors, unless he should continue within the walls of the prison for the space of twenty days.


From Lincoln.


The act of 1773, ch. 4, declares that "if any person or persons now are or hereafter shall be taken or charged on mesne process or execution for any debt, and shall have remained in close prison by the space of twenty days, it (395) shall and may be lawful for two justices of the peace," etc., upon the debtor's complying with the several requisites of the act, to discharge him. The act of 1741, ch. 2, declares, "that for the preservation of the health of all such persons as shall at any time thereafter be committed to the county prisons, the court shall have power to mark out such a parcel of land as they shall think fit, not exceeding six acres, adjoining to the prison, etc., and every prisoner not committed for treason or felony, giving good security to the sheriff of the county to keep within the said rules shall have liberty to walk therein, out of the prison, for the preservation of his or their health. And every prisoner giving such security as aforesaid, and keeping continually within the said rules, shall be and is hereby adjudged and declared to be in law a true prisoner." In a subsequent clause the same act points out the mode of recovery against the securities, if the principal should escape or violate the rules. As the act of 1741 extends the benefits of the bounds to all prisoners (except those confined for treason and felony), upon their giving security, and declares that all those who continually keep within the bounds shall be adjudged to be true prisoners, a majority of the Court are of opinion that the words "a true prisoner" are synonymous with the words "a close prisoner," and that therefore a debtor, having given security as the act directs, and remaining for the space of twenty days within the bounds, is entitled to the benefit of the insolvent debtor's act.


Summaries of

Miller v. Hunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1810
5 N.C. 394 (N.C. 1810)
Case details for

Miller v. Hunter

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MILLER v. LEWIS HUNTER ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 1, 1810

Citations

5 N.C. 394 (N.C. 1810)